Colorado Senate Passes Stringent Digital Content Bill on Cannabis and Other Substances

LOS ANGELES- The Colorado Senate recently approved SB24-158, legislation aimed at intensifying regulations on social media content concerning cannabis, psychedelics, and hemp products. This bill, met with a significant debate over free speech and the regulation of digital content, is poised to reshape how such substances are discussed online within the state.

Amendments and Opposition

Originally introduced with wider implications, SB24-158 underwent several modifications by State Senator Chris Hansen (D). The current version permits the promotion of medical and retail cannabis to individuals over the age of 21, in accordance with state regulations. Despite these changes, the bill maintains a broad scope, affecting a diverse range of substances.

The legislation explicitly categorizes certain hemp products that do not qualify as tinctures or cosmetics as “illicit substances.” These products are those containing more than 1.25 milligrams of THC per serving or those with a CBD to THC ratio less than 20 to 1. The bill passed the Senate with a decisive 30–1 vote, suggesting strong legislative support but also indicating potential future controversies, as detractors claim it may infringe upon the rights to discuss legal substances online.

Criticism and Support

Critics, including Shoshana Weismann from the R Street Institute, have criticized the bill’s potential to restrict online conversations about common medications and treatments, labeling such limitations as overly restrictive. Advocates for plant and fungi-based medicine also express concerns that the legislation could hinder educational and dialogue efforts regarding alternative treatments.

Future Steps and Context

As the bill moves to Colorado’s House Committee on Education, it continues to draw attention amidst the state’s widespread support for the legal regulation of cannabis. If enacted, social media platforms will be required to revise their policies by July 2025, under the supervision of the Colorado attorney general. This legislative move reflects the ongoing tension between regulatory efforts and free speech in the digital age.